Gwinnett’s two leading prosecutors are going to face each other in court over funds one of them says is being withheld from his office.

Solicitor General Brian Whiteside filed the lawsuit against District Attorney Danny Porter last week over an agreement Porter had reached with Whiteside’s predecessor, Rosanna Szabo. The solicitor claims funding has been taken from his office without his knowledge because of the agreement.

“Upon gaining this knowledge, the current solicitor general asked Mr. Porter to terminate said contract. He did not, “ Whiteside spokeswoman, Arteen Afshar said in a statement. “He was also informed that the unrevealed contract, as written, would put a $100,000.00 dollar deficit in the Gwinnett County Solicitor General’s current budget.

“Due to this inaction by Mr. Porter to stop unauthorized funds from the current Solicitor-General’s budget, a lawsuit has been filed.”

The battle is over funds raised through a 5% surcharge on all fines related to the Victim Assistance Program.

A copy of a letter that was included in Whiteside’s lawsuit shows Porter and Szabo sent a letter to Gwinnett County Commission Chairwoman Charlotte Nash in December 2018, after Whiteside defeated Szabo in that year’s election for the Solicitor General’s Office.

The letter shows Porter and Szabo agreed to continue sending all funds raised from the surcharge to the District Attorney’s Office to support its Victims Witness Program while all funds raised from the surcharge in State Court would go to the Solicitor’s Office to support its Victims Witness Program.

Of the remaining funds collected in Magistrate, Recorders and Municipal Courts, 65% is to to go to the District Attorney’s Office’s Victims Witness Program while the remainder goes to the Solicitor General’s Office’s Victims Witness Program.

“The current Gwinnett County Solicitor General gained knowledge of this contract by an employee of the Gwinnett County Solicitor General’s Office and the Gwinnett County Financial Division, not Mr. Porter or former Solicitor General Szabo,” Afshar said.

“He was informed that funds were coming out of the Gwinnett County Solicitor General’s current budget due to the unauthorized contract signed by Mr. Porter and former Solicitor-General Szabo.”

Porter, however, said the agreement was not a binding contract. The district attorney explained that only the Gwinnett County Board of Commissioners determines where the funds will go, and it asks the two prosecutors to work out an agreement among themselves for the board to ratify.

For that reason, Porter said, Whiteside should be suing the Board of Commissioners, which took legislative action to ratify the allocation between the two offices, which made it official.

“I think the county attorney tried to explain it to him (and) I tried to explain it to him,” Porter said. “It’s clear he doesn’t understand how the money is allocated and negating the agreement would have no effect on the current distribution of funds.”

Support Local Journalism

Now, more than ever, the world needs trustworthy reporting—but good journalism isn’t free. Please support us by subscribing or making a contribution today.

I'm a Crawford Long baby who grew up in Marietta and eventually wandered to the University of Southern Mississippi for college. Earned a BA in journalism (double minor in political science and history). Previously worked in Florida and Clayton County.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Please log in, or sign up for a new, free account to read or post comments.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.