0

LETTERS: Local board has right to speak out on charter amendment

I am full support of the state school superintendent and local school boards' rights to speak out on any proposed amendment that affects how students are educated in our state. Local school boards are elected to help decide what is best for the students in their jurisdiction.

If the governor is not restricted from voicing his opinion while in his role as governor (who lives on taxpayer funds) then it makes sense that local school board officials should be able to voice their position as well. Freedom of speech is a cornerstone of our country and state and speaking out for or against this amendment does not seem to put anyone in immediate danger. I say let the school board speak for what is best for the students in their area.

As a former school board member, it is hard to understand how this amendment will benefit all students since only some will be able to get into these schools. Our teachers have seen less take-home pay for the last five years with frozen pay scales, furlough days and rising health care costs. So why should the state be able to remove funding from local schools to fund small schools with no local accountability?

I agree with the school board and Superintendent Alvin Wilbanks that this will be bad for education in Georgia. There is just not enough money to go around to give charter school choice to all students of Gwinnett County, which has already funded the Gwinnett School of Math, Science and Technology and the Gwinnett Online Campus.

I will continue to support the local control by elected officials to decide what is best for our students.

-- Cecil GoberSugar Hill

Comments

kevin 1 year, 11 months ago

They do not have a right to speak out on the public's dollar. Almost all state employee system's requirements for a job includes the forbidding to get involved in election issues, including posting signs on your personal property. The AG, Olens, may also be negligent for not enforcing the laws that he took an oath to enforce. Besides all this, the State is giving this money to the local boards and so they also have a direct right into making sure these funds are wisely spent. Wouldn't you insist on controlling where your money gets spent if you were giving it all away? Maybe the really good teachers will apply for jobs at the Charter schools. Ever think of that? "As a former school board member, it is hard to understand how this amendment will benefit all students since only some will be able to get into these schools." With all due respect, I think you missed the point of Charter schools with this statement. They are never going to be able to have enough room for every student without a system "takeover." They are to help certain students that are not learning under your present system.

0

Sign in to comment