YARBROUGH: Controversial transportation referendum on shaky ground

Dick Yarbrough

Dick Yarbrough

The 10-county, $7 billion Metro Atlanta transportation referendum is set to be decided by voters on July 31. If passed, the plan will be funded for 10 years by a 1-cent sales tax. Even if your county votes it down, the measure still becomes law if a majority votes for it. To call the referendum controversial is an understatement. To say passage is shaky is not.

I have heard from a host of anti-SPLOST advocates but no one from the proponents' side. I called Bert Brantley the other day to see why he thinks you should vote for the transportation package. Brantley, former communications director for Gov. Sonny Perdue, is spokesman for the referendum.

He told me that there are three points he is trying to get across to voters about the plan. First, he says, there will be strict accountability. A citizen's advisory panel will be established and will issue annual progress reports to the public. Secondly, large portions of the transportation plan will be under local control. "There are a lot of badly needed local projects -- sidewalks, turn lanes, road improvements -- that will be the responsibility of city and county governments," he states. And finally, Brantley says that if Metro Atlanta is going to be competitive with other large metro areas in the future, we have to convince companies contemplating a move here that we have a plan to deal with our traffic problems.

As for the most controversial part of the plan -- rapid transit -- Brantley says there is nothing in the referendum that changes current law and allows MARTA to expand outside its current operating area of Fulton and DeKalb counties. Most of the money contained in the referendum for MARTA -- $600 million -- is for capital improvements. As for some kind of regional transit system, Brantley says that would take future legislative action.

Fayette County Commissioner Steve Brown, a leading opponent of the referendum disagrees strongly. Brown points out that MARTA CEO Beverly Scott told lawmakers last year that even if the referendum passes, MARTA will still face $2.3 billion in unfunded maintenance needs over the life of the referendum. "Who or what will pay for this?" the commissioner asks, "It reminds me of Nancy Pelosi's comment about the health care bill: 'Let's pass it and then we will see what's in it.'"

In Brown's mind, there is no question that passing the transportation referendum will be the first step to imposing MARTA and its crushing debt onto all 10 counties. Brown cites DeKalb County CEO Burrell Ellis who told an Atlanta Regional Commission breakfast, "We need a regional system where everyone participates and everyone pays."

Roswell Mayor Jere Wood told the Atlanta newspapers last fall, "A 1-cent sales tax would not by itself be enough to build the transit system we need but the creation of a regional transit authority with regional funding would lead to a regional bus and rail system."

Therein lies the problem with selling the referendum to the voting public. I take Bert Brantley at his word but he is dealing with a bunch of people so off-message that voters don't know what or who to believe.

The referendum proponents have only themselves to blame if the measure fails. They have let their opponents succinctly frame the arguments and they don't seem to know how to get the momentum back. One supporter says the pro-SPLOST advocates are "tired." It shows. Recent presentations have degenerated into hectoring, lecturing and finger-wagging.

One factor proponents have to deal with is that voters don't trust politicians to do what they say they will do. Witness the many Republicans who voted for HB 277, authorizing the referendum, and are now deserting it. If they liked the proposal then, why don't they like it now? Forget their weasel-worded explanations. The truth is that they have discovered that their constituents are upset with them. (Shouldn't proponents have seen that one coming?)

Clearly, we have traffic issues in the region that need to be solved but this transportation referendum may be toast. It is losing public support daily. It is going to take one whale of an advertising blitz to resuscitate it by July 31. Frankly, I think this TSPLOST was dead on arrival. From the start, this has been a top-down effort by Atlanta area business moguls, chambers of commerce and real estate developers that has generated little grassroots support. That is always a recipe for failure. I would suggest the pro-SPLOST crowd start thinking about a Plan B.

Email columnist Dick Yarbrough at yarb2400@bellsouth.net. For archived columns, go to www.gwinnettdailypost.com/dickyarbrough.


kevin 3 years, 2 months ago

this said it all. No one is voting for it except politicians and business owners, top down never works. No way I'm giving all these government people billions to control. Let them vote for the tax increase. Most of those that supported this on the ballot will be voted out next election. We won't forget.


teelee 3 years, 2 months ago

This tax doesn't have a chance because of the "Hope and Change" economy we have been in for the last few years. If MARTA can't turn a profit on it's own then shut it down. It is nothing but a big hole to throw money into and a nice place to get robbed.


rco1847 3 years, 2 months ago

Their justification completely ignors the basis for the public disgust. Gwinnett BOC had three successive resignations-in-disgrace and a possible 4th within recent months. I don't want this county government getting control of another dime until they've earned / restored trust and integrity. A billion cars can run out of gas on I-85 I could care less. The EZ - Pass was shoved down our throats and now I'll shove the Splost down theirs. The Briscoe Field incident was a fiasco and proved that our BOC does not care about the voters. In the end the BOC all said they were listening to the voters which was an insulting lie. They lost an essential board member vote and coundn't win passage without it and thats the only reason they changed their tune. That member is / or will be sitting in jail soon. Our state unemployment fund had been raided for years and use to fund tax breaks for businesses. We were warned about it. Now we've a 700 million debt to repay and replinish. Tax and spend is all our state and local governments do. EZ Pass is nothing more than taxing us for the road we already paid for. The same people will benefit every time. VOTE NO ON SPLOST., We may have traffic problems but our elected officials may start to get the message of being accountable. Meanwhile, the House Speaker can explain why we all didn't get a $17,000 trip to Europe for our families. Give them a dime and they'll spend a dollar.


CitizenY 3 years, 2 months ago

"Strict accountability" and "citizen's advisory board" are terms that make me laugh out loud, considering the source. If Gwinnett gets more money they'll spend it on medians, 8-way traffic lights (because we can't be trusted to turn left), medians, signs, medians, traffic cameras, medians, operation of EMPTY BUSES, and medians. Most of those alleged improvements are actually obstructive and wasteful.

As for MARTA--they need to charge by rider mileage, and if it costs $5 it SHOULD cost $5.


dentaldawg83 3 years, 2 months ago

All levels of government lie...If this fails, it will be because most folks just don't trust what we are being told. I know I don't and history backs me up here.


Sign in to comment