Five myths about 'American exceptionalism'

Over the last two centuries, prominent Americans have described the United States as an "empire of liberty," a "shining city on a hill," the "last best hope of Earth," the "leader of the free world," and the "indispensable nation." These enduring tropes explain why all presidential candidates feel compelled to offer ritualistic paeans to America's greatness and why President Barack Obama landed in hot water -- most recently, from Mitt Romney -- for saying that while he believed in "American exceptionalism," it was no different from "British exceptionalism," "Greek exceptionalism," or any other country's brand of patriotic chest-thumping.

Most statements of "American exceptionalism" presume that America's values, political system, and history are unique and worthy of universal admiration. They also imply that the United States is both destined and entitled to play a distinct and positive role on the world stage.

The only thing wrong with this self-congratulatory portrait of America's global role is that it is mostly a myth. Although the United States possesses certain unique qualities -- from high levels of religiosity to a political culture that privileges individual freedom -- the conduct of U.S. foreign policy has been determined primarily by its relative power and by the inherently competitive nature of international politics. By focusing on their supposedly exceptional qualities, Americans blind themselves to the ways that they are a lot like everyone else.Myth 1There is something exceptional about American exceptionalism.

Whenever American leaders refer to the "unique" responsibilities of the United States, they are saying that it is different from other powers and that these differences require them to take on special burdens.

Yet there is nothing unusual about such lofty declarations; indeed, those who make them are treading a well-worn path. Most great powers have considered themselves superior to their rivals and have believed that they were advancing some greater good when they imposed their preferences on others.

The British thought they were bearing the "white man's burden," while French colonialists invoked la mission civilisatrice to justify their empire. Even many of the officials of the former Soviet Union genuinely believed they were leading the world toward a socialist utopia despite the many cruelties that communist rule inflicted.

Of course, the United States has by far the better claim to virtue than Stalin or his successors, but Obama was right to remind us that all countries prize their own particular qualities.

So when Americans proclaim they are exceptional and indispensable, they are simply the latest nation to sing a familiar old song. Among great powers, thinking you're special is the norm, not the exception.Myth 2The United States behaves better than other nations do.

Declarations of American exceptionalism rest on the belief that the United States is a uniquely virtuous nation, one that loves peace, nurtures liberty, respects human rights, and embraces the rule of law. Americans like to think their country behaves much better than other states do, and certainly better than other great powers.

If only it were true. The United States may not have been as brutal as the worst states in world history, but a dispassionate look at the historical record belies most claims about America's moral superiority.

For starters, the United States has been one of the most expansionist powers in modern history. It began as 13 small colonies clinging to the Eastern Seaboard, but eventually expanded across North America, seizing Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, and California from Mexico in 1846. Along the way, it eliminated most of the native population and confined the survivors to impoverished reservations. By the mid-19th century, it had pushed Britain out of the Pacific Northwest and consolidated its hegemony over the Western Hemisphere.

The United States has fought numerous wars since then -- starting several of them -- and its wartime conduct has hardly been a model of restraint. The 1899-1902 conquest of the Philippines killed some 200,000 to 400,000 Filipinos, most of them civilians, and the United States and its allies did not hesitate to dispatch some 305,000 German and 330,000 Japanese civilians through aerial bombing during World War II, mostly through deliberate campaigns against enemy cities. No wonder Gen. Curtis LeMay, who directed the bombing campaign against Japan, told an aide, "If the U.S. lost the war, we would be prosecuted as war criminals." The United States dropped more than 6 million tons of bombs during the Indochina war, including tons of napalm and lethal defoliants like Agent Orange, and it is directly responsible for the deaths of many of the roughly 1 million civilians who died in that war.

The United States never conquered a vast overseas empire or caused millions to die through tyrannical blunders like China's Great Leap Forward or Stalin's forced collectivization. And given the vast power at its disposal for much of the past century, Washington could certainly have done much worse. But the record is clear: U.S. leaders have done what they thought they had to do when confronted by external dangers, and they paid scant attention to moral principles along the way. The idea that the United States is uniquely virtuous may be comforting to Americans; too bad it's not true.Myth 3America's success is due to its special genius.

The United States has enjoyed remarkable success, and Americans tend to portray their rise to world power as a direct result of the political foresight of the Founding Fathers, the virtues of the U.S. Constitution, the priority placed on individual liberty, and the creativity and hard work of the American people. In this narrative, the United States enjoys an exceptional global position today because it is, well, exceptional.

There is more than a grain of truth to this version of American history. It's not an accident that immigrants came to America in droves in search of economic opportunity, and the "melting pot" myth facilitated the assimilation of each wave of new Americans. America's scientific and technological achievements are fully deserving of praise and owe something to the openness and vitality of the American political order.

But America's past success is due as much to good luck as to any uniquely American virtues. The new nation was lucky that the continent was lavishly endowed with natural resources and traversed by navigable rivers. It was lucky to have been founded far from the other great powers and even luckier that the native population was less advanced and highly susceptible to European diseases. Americans were fortunate that the European great powers were at war for much of the republic's early history, which greatly facilitated its expansion across the continent, and its global primacy was ensured after the other great powers fought two devastating world wars. This account of America's rise does not deny that the United States did many things right, but it also acknowledges that America's present position owes as much to good fortune as to any special genius or "manifest destiny."Myth 4The United States is responsible for most of the good in the world.

Americans are fond of giving themselves credit for positive international developments. President Bill Clinton believed the United States was "indispensable to the forging of stable political relations," and the late Harvard University political scientist Samuel P. Huntington thought U.S. primacy was central "to the future of freedom, democracy, open economies, and international order in the world."

Once again, there is something to this line of argument, just not enough to make it entirely accurate. The United States has made undeniable contributions to peace and stability in the world over the past century, including the Marshall Plan, the creation and management of the Bretton Woods system, its rhetorical support for the core principles of democracy and human rights, and its mostly stabilizing military presence in Europe and the Far East. But the belief that all good things flow from Washington's wisdom overstates the U.S. contribution by a wide margin.

For starters, though Americans watching "Saving Private Ryan" or "Patton" may conclude that the United States played the central role in vanquishing Nazi Germany, most of the fighting was in Western Europe, and the main burden of defeating Hitler's war machine was borne by the Soviet Union. Similarly, though the Marshall Plan and NATO played important roles in Europe's post-World War II success, Europeans deserve at least as much credit for rebuilding their economies, constructing a novel economic and political union, and moving beyond four centuries of sometimes bitter rivalry. Americans also tend to think they won the Cold War all by themselves, a view that ignores the contributions of other anti-Soviet adversaries and the courageous dissidents whose resistance to communist rule produced the "velvet revolutions" of 1989.

Moreover, as Godfrey Hodgson recently noted in his sympathetic but clear-eyed book, "The Myth of American Exceptionalism," the spread of liberal ideals is a global phenomenon with roots in the Enlightenment, and European philosophers and political leaders did much to advance the democratic ideal. Similarly, the abolition of slavery and the long effort to improve the status of women owe more to Britain and other democracies than to the United States, where progress in both areas trailed many other countries. Nor can the United States claim a global leadership role today on gay rights, criminal justice, or economic equality -- Europe's got those areas covered.

Bottom line: Americans take too much credit for global progress and accept too little blame for areas where U.S. policy has in fact been counterproductive.Myth 5God is on our side.

A crucial component of American exceptionalism is the belief that the United States has a divinely ordained mission to lead the rest of the world. Ronald Reagan told audiences that there was "some divine plan" that had placed America here, and once quoted Pope Pius XII saying, "Into the hands of America God has placed the destinies of an afflicted mankind." Bush offered a similar view in 2004, saying, "We have a calling from beyond the stars to stand for freedom." The same idea was expressed, albeit less nobly, in Otto von Bismarck's alleged quip that "God has a special providence for fools, drunks, and the United States."

Confidence is a valuable commodity for any country. But when a nation starts to think it enjoys the mandate of heaven and becomes convinced that it cannot fail or be led astray by scoundrels or incompetents, then reality is likely to deliver a swift rebuke. Ancient Athens, Napoleonic France, imperial Japan, and countless other countries have succumbed to this sort of hubris, and nearly always with catastrophic results.

Despite America's many successes, the country is hardly immune from setbacks, follies, and boneheaded blunders. If you have any doubts about that, just reflect on how a decade of ill-advised tax cuts, two costly and unsuccessful wars, and a financial meltdown driven mostly by greed and corruption have managed to squander the privileged position the United States enjoyed at the end of the 20th century. Instead of assuming that God is on their side, perhaps Americans should heed Abraham Lincoln's admonition that our greatest concern should be "whether we are on God's side."

Stephen M. Walt is a professor of international affairs at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government.


hnealg 3 years, 10 months ago

The writer of this article must have swallowed the Obama/Democrat kool-aid! This "writing" is terribly anti-American and the writer should be ashamed.


Kent 3 years, 10 months ago

America has its faults, but it is still the greatest nation on the planet, otherwise people from all over the globe want to come here. By the way, people who take responsibility for their own welfare are better and more exceptional than the moochers who expect the government to take from the producers and provide them all their needs. It is amusing that our current first lady commented that she was not proud to be an American til her husband was elected president. This Harvard progressive [Marxist] mirrors the view of our president and his followers.


SuxBeanU 3 years, 10 months ago

What was the purpose of re-printing this hit piece on the United States of America? By doing so, the GDP just descended to the depths of HufPo and WaPo, in condemning America for some of it's past, but neglecting any of the accomplishments. If one was to read any of the authors other writings, one would easily see that he has a decidedly liberal, anti-American, anti-Israel bias, somewhat in keeping with much of the academia in this country. I can only hope that the GDP will now grant an equal amount of space, and position, to the writings of someone that supports the United States of America, rather than hates the country that allows a screed like this to be printed.


Jan 3 years, 10 months ago

It is no wonder that so many nations are out performing USA in so many categories. Here we have a well researched well written article and yet the first three to respond to it find a need to demean the author with unfounded insults. If you believe some of the facts are wrong, then look them up and point out the errors. These letters demonstrate how brainwashed some have become. If we are to improve our nation, we must understand our shortcomings and work to fix them. We cheer our favorite sports team with chants like "We are the best" even if we loose half our games. We do this to encourage each team member to strive to perform at their best but then the coach will be honest with the team and tell them that they are not the best for only with that knowledge are they in a position to learn to do better. The writers that just build up our self esteem with lies about the superiority of America only help us accept the status quo and allow other nations to take the lead as they have done in many areas including health care, education and civil liberties. Our greatest pride lies in our developing a Democracy but have allowed it to slowly evolve into an oligarchy. We can turn this around if we face the facts, research candidates and vote for the best person for the job overall.


SuxBeanU 3 years, 10 months ago

Brainwashed? Hardly. It is obvious that you have never read any of the authors work, or researched any of his writings on the USA. Had you done any research, you would see that his contempt for the USA runs to all things, past and present. And, as far as your juvenile sports analogies, please save them for the sports page, as I couldn't care less about sports. Concerning why we are falling behind other nations, maybe you should read more of what Mr. Walt has to say on that matter. It is his opinion that we should throw open the doors of our universities and educate the world so that no nation is better than any other nation. That is why he so wishes to lay waste to the idea of American exceptionalism. Concerning your belief that we are a democracy that is evolving into an oligarchy, well, first we aren't a democracy, we are a republic and second, we will only become an oligarchy if voters continue to re-elect the same players each election cycle. This means both sides, not just my side.


jbarronton 3 years, 10 months ago

"Americans blind themselves to the ways that they are a lot like everyone else." You would think a professor at Harvard would know the definition of "exceptional". The primary definition is "unusual or not typical" or, as the author states, "not like everyone else". The Author bases his article on the fact that Americans are not exceptional then states that this is due to the fact that they are in fact exceptional. To get the authors true perspective it is my belief that the reader must assume a british accent while reading. Someone once blogged something I think address the authors concerns quite well so I will re-post it here: …Most of the recent mistakes of American public policy, and most of the contemporary delusions of American public life, haven’t come from an ignorant and excitable public. They’ve been produced by highly educated and sophisticated elites.

Needless to say, the public’s not always right, and public opinion’s not always responsible. But as publics go, the American public has a pretty good track record.

In the 1930s, the American people didn’t fall — unlike so many of their supposed intellectual betters — for either fascism or Communism. Since World War II, the American people have resisted the temptations of isolationism and protectionism, and have turned their backs on a history of bigotry.


FactChecker 3 years, 10 months ago

Some basic problems with your argument: 1. Though some dictionaries offer "unusual or not typical" as the primary definition of "exceptional", others offer "much greater than usual, especially in skill, intelligence, quality, etc" as the primary definition. 2. When a word has two or more meanings, then the reader is to use the context and intelligence to determine which meaning is intended by the author. For example: "Don't carry lead weights if you expect to lead in the race." 3. In your concluding statement, you have drifted from facts for we did drift into a period of "isolationism and protectionism" during the 30's and now have substituted the other, equally bad extreme, of imperialism and nation building. 4. And finally the ambiguity of "...and have turned their backs on a history of bigotry" which could simply mean that we ignore and deny the history of bigotry - definitely true for many today. But, you probably intended to imply that bigotry doesn't exist in spite of the overt signs of racism, sexism as well as organized discrimination against some religions and people of different sexual orientation. When reactions to unwanted information is "If you don't like the way we want it, then you should leave the country" is an example of begotry that is reflected within these comments below.


nag6970 3 years, 10 months ago

Professor Walt should move to one of the other countries he mentions. Perhaps to Iraq ? How about Russia ?

"Setbacks, follies, and boneheaded blunders, If you have any doubts about that, just reflect on how a decade of ill-advised tax cuts, two costly and unsuccessful wars, and a financial meltdown driven mostly by greed and corruption have managed to squander the privileged position the United States enjoyed at the end of the 20th century." Once again caused by whom ? Your subtle injection of the political beliefs, of the democrat party is not without expectation. College Professors, on the most part, have not changed the liberal thinking in the past forty five years. If Professor Walt was not protesting the Vietnam War and calling all "Baby Killers" it was only because of his age.


Sign in to comment