0

Tressel had history of compliance issues at Ohio St.

FILE - This Dec. 30, 2010, file photo shows Ohio State head football coach Jim Tressel speaking at a news conference for the upcoming Sugar Bowl NCAA college football matchup between his team and Arkansas , in New Orleans. An evaluation Tressel's job performance in 2005-06 rated him as "unacceptable" in self-reporting violations in a timely manner. Records released Friday, July 15, 2011,  by the university as part of a public-records request show that Tressel, forced to resign on May 30 for knowing about NCAA violations and then covering them up, was graded "excellent" in 10 of the 12 areas in the evaluation. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert, File)

FILE - This Dec. 30, 2010, file photo shows Ohio State head football coach Jim Tressel speaking at a news conference for the upcoming Sugar Bowl NCAA college football matchup between his team and Arkansas , in New Orleans. An evaluation Tressel's job performance in 2005-06 rated him as "unacceptable" in self-reporting violations in a timely manner. Records released Friday, July 15, 2011, by the university as part of a public-records request show that Tressel, forced to resign on May 30 for knowing about NCAA violations and then covering them up, was graded "excellent" in 10 of the 12 areas in the evaluation. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert, File)

COLUMBUS, Ohio -- Former Ohio State coach Jim Tressel was told by the school that he did a poor job of self-reporting NCAA violations years before he failed to tell his bosses that players were selling championship rings and other Buckeyes memorabilia, a cover-up that cost him his job.

In an evaluation of Tressel's job performance from 2005-06, then-athletic director Andy Geiger rated Tressel ''unacceptable'' in terms of self-reporting rules violations in a timely manner. The coach also was warned in a separate letter that he and his staff needed to do a better job of monitoring the cars the Buckeyes were driving -- an issue that would arise again this spring.

The documents were part of a mountain of public records released Friday by Ohio State dealing with Tressel and the ongoing scandal that has sullied one of the nation's elite football programs.

Tressel received a letter of reprimand from then-athletic director Andy Geiger for giving a recruit a Buckeyes jersey -- a clear NCAA violation -- before he had even coached his first game.

In spite of a sparkling 106-22 record and winning the 2002 national championship, Tressel was forced to step down on May 30 after it became clear that he had knowingly played ineligible players during the 2010 season. Investigators discovered he found out in April 2010 that players were receiving cash and discounted tattoos from the owner of a local tattoo parlor in exchange for OSU football memorabilia, but he did not report them to his superiors or NCAA compliance officers -- and didn't even acknowledge he had known of the problem until confronted in January.

Ohio State, which has vacated the 2010 season including its share of the Big Ten championship, and has issued itself a two-year probation, is now facing an Aug. 12 meeting before the NCAA's committee on infractions.

Tressel received a letter of reprimand from Geiger for giving a recruit a Buckeyes jersey, clearly breaking an NCAA bylaw, before he had even coached his first game. Geiger put the letter in Tressel's personnel file on June 15, 2001 -- he was hired earlier that year on Jan. 17.

In his '05-'06 evaluation, Tressel was graded ''excellent'' in 10 of 12 areas. Yet the NCAA-Ohio State evaluation form also rated Tressel unacceptable in self-reporting violations and in ''timely and accurate completion of phone and unofficial visit logs.'' Ohio State says that current AD Gene Smith met with Tressel for oral evaluations of his performance and that no written records exist.

In Ohio State's response to the NCAA's allegations against Tressel and the program last week, Tressel said, ''I take full responsibility for my mistakes that have led to the ongoing NCAA inquiry and to scrutiny and criticism of the football program.''

This spring, the NCAA also investigated the cars driven by Ohio State players. That subject was broached in a letter by Geiger dated Sept. 9, 2003, that cautioned Tressel he and his staff needed to do a better job of monitoring the players' cars.

''In the course of the investigation, there were questions surrounding, among others, (redacted name's) automobiles and cell phone use,'' Geiger wrote to Tressel. ''I am writing to make it clear that the University expects you and your staff to pay attention to automobiles driven by the football student-athletes and report to the Athletic Compliance Office any unusual circumstances with respect to such automobiles.''