Friday, November 21, 2008
© Copyright 2013
Gwinnett Daily Post
ATLANTA - The judge hearing the case against convicted courthouse gunman Brian Nichols chided prosecutors Thursday for introducing evidence of a threatening phone call, but he refused a request by defense attorneys to declare a mistrial.
Superior Court Judge James Bodiford said prosecutors violated a court order by playing a tape of Nichols apparently threatening to kill Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard without first providing defense attorneys a transcript of the call. But after taking a 20-minute recess to consider the defense motion for a mistrial, he said the mistake was a 'technical violation' that did not merit a mistrial. He did, however, concede that the evidence would likely come up in an appeal of whatever sentence Nichols receives. Nichols was found guilty Nov. 7 of murdering a judge, a court reporter, a sheriff's deputy and a federal agent when he escaped from a 2005 rape trial in Atlanta. The jury is now hearing testimony about whether Nichols should receive a death sentence. Prosecutors this week played a June 2006 phone call from Nichols in which he said if he could have done something different, he would have 'stopped on the third floor and shot your a--.' Howard works on the third floor of the Fulton County Courthouse. Nichols' attorneys filed a motion seeking a mistrial Thursday, saying they were not provided a transcript of the call before the evidence was introduced. The motion contends the 'content of the call was highly prejudicial to Mr. Nichols and his right to a fair trial.' Nichols' attorneys, who have repeatedly asked the judge to declare a mistrial throughout the case, said the phone call caught the defense team by surprise and did irreparable damage to their case. 'It's a bell that simply can't be unrung,' defense attorney Robert McGlasson said. 'It's so clear this is prejudicial.'More like this story
- Nichols prosecution concludes ( October 15, 2008 )
- Prosecutors challenge accused courthouse gunman's effort to remove them ( November 2, 2005 )
- Nichols lawyers say no reason to impose gag order ( September 22, 2007 )
- Jury weighs life or death for Atlanta court gunman ( December 10, 2008 )
- Defense: Nichols funding is under threat ( September 25, 2007 )

Comments
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.
Sign in to comment
Or login with:
OpenID