Victim denies abuse occurred in molestation trial
Save Email Print
Posted: 6:49 PM Nov 10, 2009
Victim denies abuse occurred in molestation trial
Protected by immunity, a family member of child molestation suspect Kenneth Anthony Jones told a second jury in as many months Tuesday that Anthony never sexually assaulted her.
Reporter: Josh Green
Email Address: josh.green@gwinnettdailypost.com
Font Size:

LAWRENCEVILLE — Protected by immunity, a family member of child molestation suspect Kenneth Anthony Jones told a second jury in as many months Tuesday that Anthony never sexually assaulted her.

Jones faces potentially damaging charges — aggravated sexual battery, aggravated sodomy, child molestation, incest and rape — based on statements the family member told authorities four years ago, when she was 15.

At the outset of another trial last month, the alleged victim refused to testify and was jailed on felony contempt charges for two days, said Jones’ defense attorney, Lawrence Lewis.

She finally took the stand Oct. 22 and denied that any abuse had occurred, Lewis said. The prosecution’s case rests solely on her previous statements to police and no medical evidence exists, he said.

Testifying before a new jury Tuesday afternoon, the woman, now 19, sang the same tune. Prosecutors have granted her full immunity, meaning her testimony cannot be used against her to file new charges, such as false reporting of a crime.

“It really never happened — he never had sexual contact with me,” she testified.

The allegations cost Jones, a Snellville resident working as a security guard at a mental health facility, nearly a month in jail in October 2005. The alleged victim testified she’d concocted the story because Jones and his wife weren’t paying her enough attention and she wished to live in a foster home, she testified.

She first spun the bogus story for friends at South Gwinnett High School, then school administrators and later Snellville police detectives, she said.

“I didn’t feel like I got the attention I wanted,” she testified. “I thought ... I would go live with somebody else and the case would go away.”

Jones eventually posted $27,800 bond and was released from the Gwinnett County Jail. He remains free on bond.

In light of the allegations, the alleged victim remained in the custody of the Division of Family and Children Services until she turned 18.

During questioning from a prosecutor, she denied she’d been offered financial incentives to not testify, or that other family members had talked her out of incriminating Jones.

The earlier trial was discontinued but not declared a mistrial because the jury had not been sworn, said Assistant District Attorney Jay Hughes. Testimony is expected to resume today.


Latest Comments

Posted by: Darwinsdog Location: Atlanta on Nov 23, 2009 at 11:47 AM

Why did the case come to trial ? If a victim recants they have to frame the real victim or intimidate the original victim.It appears they did both here.You can't blame the girl. She was 15 and with zero investigation her story was believed or even coached. The DA's office says they are short on money and want to raise taxes yet they spend the peoples money on a case they knew involved bludgeoning an innocent man. If they didn't know what her testimony would be they are incompetent. If they knew she recanted but tried to send this guy away then they are criminals willing to take this poor guy's life from him just to get a win in court. Either way I hope the people of Gwinnett remember all the "Not Guilty" verdicts and the "Overturned" at appeals this Da has given them because the evidence wasn't there in the first place. You have a DA that will prosecute someone that he knows is innocent because he already started on the case. At least it appears that way. Corruption at its finest.
Posted by: Michael Location: L'ville on Nov 19, 2009 at 10:21 AM

I too was a member of this jury pool (was not selected) and agree that this case should not have gone forward without the da's star witness. They gave her immunity and new that she was going to recant. It seems as though they were just throwing it against the wall to see if it would stick. I know that police officers are reviewed for arrest to conviction ratios but this seemd like a witch hunt to me. Is the job of the d/a to find the truth or is it to win at all costs. This is a man's life we are talking about. I wonder how many innocent people are in prison in the State of Ga because the Gwinnett solicitor does not know when to call off the hounds. This man had to wake up every morning since 2004 with prison on his mind. I think that he should be compensated. You can start with my $30 per day for having to show up for this nonsense. Thank God the jury saw through this hogwash and I wonder if those jurists feel the same way that I feel.
Posted by: Erik Location: Cooper on Nov 16, 2009 at 08:35 AM

In 2005, I was brought to trial in Gwinnett County for false allegations of child sexual abuse. The allegations began after I filed an unprecedented lawsuit to reform the adoption laws for foster kids. I was a foster parent and, against the wishes of DFACS, tried to adopt four brothers to keep them together (the state later separated them). After caring for 42 foster kids, only 5 days after I filed my adoption lawsuit, the state retaliated with allegations that I molested the kids. At trial, we proved the children had been "coached" by Gwinnett Police detectives and a DFACS psychologist. I was acquitted on all charges, including 9 "lesser included offenses" the state tacked on when they realized they were losing their case. Danny Porter was the henchman behind the case. Your article is just the tip of the iceburg. There are many similar stories of corrupt practices of Gwinnett Police and the District Attorney's creating false victims. See, www.ErikCooper.com.